Date:
1977
Study Location:
New York, NY, US
Manuscript Type:
Journal
Full Citation:
Decker, J. (1992). “Curbside Deterrence?” In R.V. Clarke (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. 2nd ed. Albany, N.Y.: Harrow and Heston
Results:
In ten areas of slug rejection machines slug use decreased substantially with a range from 29% to 64%. Warning labels only areas saw no credible reduction, but some areas decreased prior to implementation of labels suggesting diffusion of benefit effect from slug rejecting machine areas.
Study Number:
56.00