Author(s):
Barclay, P., J. Buckley, P.J. Brantingham, P.L. Brantingham and T. Whinn-Yates
Date:
1996
Study Location:
Vancouver, BC
Manuscript Type:
Book Series
Full Citation: 
Barclay, P., J. Buckley, P.J. Brantingham, P.L. Brantingham and T. Whinn-Yates (1997). “Preventing Auto Theft in Commuter Parking Lots: A Bike Patrol in Vancouver.” In R.V. Clarke (ed.), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. 2nd ed. Guilderland, N.Y.: Harrow and Heston
Results:
Target: 82% decrease; versus only 45% and 53% decrease in comparison areas
File:
04_buckley.pdf (556.2 KB)
Study Number: 
12.00
Author(s):
Atlanta (Ga.) Regional Commission
Date:
1974
Study Location:
Atlanta, GA, US
Manuscript Type:
Government Report
Full Citation: 
Atlanta (Ga.) Regional Commission (1974). Street Light Project: Final Evaluation Report. Atlanta, Ga.: The Commission
Results:
Target crimes continued to increase post intervention; though the rate of increase for burglaries did slow.
File:
Study Number: 
8.00
Author(s):
Atkins, S., S. Husain and A. Storey
Date:
1991
Study Location:
London, England, UK
Manuscript Type:
Government Report
Full Citation: 
Atkins, S., S. Husain and A. Storey (1991). The Influence of Street Lighting on Crime and Fear of Crime. Crime Prevention Unit; Paper 28. London: Home Office, Crime Prevention Unit
Results:
Target area 2.7% decrease in night time crimes (not sig. w/ Chi-sq.); Five zones found sig. change but conflicting findings three zones decreased while two increased; Surveys showed reduced fear
File:
Study Number: 
7.00
Author(s):
Arthur Young & Co.
Date:
1978
Study Location:
Chicago, IL, US
Manuscript Type:
Organizational Report
Full Citation: 
Arthur Young & Co. (1978). Second-Year Evaluation Report for Cabrini-Green High Impact Program. Chicago: Arthur Young & Co
Results:
Crime decreased in treatment estate 29 percent a rate greater than comparison estate and Chicago overall. Four buildings where situational interventions were implemented experienced a 50 percent decrease in index crimes and a 38 percent decrease in non-index offenses.
File:
Study Number: 
6.00
Author(s):
Armitage, R., G. Smyth and K. Pease
Date:
1999
Study Location:
Burnley, Lancashire, UK
Manuscript Type:
Book Series
Full Citation: 
Armitage, R., G. Smyth and K. Pease (1999). “Burnley CCTV Evaluation.” In K. Painter and N. Tilley (eds.). Surveillance of Public Space, CCTV, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 10. Monsey, N.Y.: Criminal Justice Press
Results:
Target area - 28% decrease; Displacement area - 1% decrease; Comparison area - 9% increase
File:
09-Armitage.pdf (431.54 KB)
Study Number: 
5.00
Author(s):
Armitage, R.
Date:
2000
Study Location:
West Yorkshire, UK
Manuscript Type:
Govt. Research Brief
Full Citation: 
Armitage, R. (2000). “An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing Within West Yorkshire.” Briefing Note 7/00. London: Home Office, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit
Results:
26% fewer overall crime rate in Target area; Twice number of burglary offenses in Comparison areas compared to Target; 42% fewer vehicle crimes in Target area;
File:
04-Armitage.pdf (80.74 KB)
Study Number: 
4.00
Author(s):
Abernethy, I.
Date:
2002
Study Location:
Launceston, Australia
Manuscript Type:
Government Report
Full Citation: 
Abernethy, I. (2002). Launceston – Lighting for Crime Prevention. Launceston, Australia: Launceston City Council
Results:
Case study 1) 42% decrease in calls for service; 2) low fear of crime; 3) 85% decrease in commercial burglary, but 127% increase in vandalism; 4) low fear of crime; 5) inconclusive
File:
01-Abernethy.pdf (2.3 MB)
Study Number: 
1.00

Evaluation

Please help us improve this and future modules by completing the short survey below.

4. Years of Police Service
5. Were you assigned to complete this course as part of a required training or academic course?
6. Approximately how long did it take you to complete the module?
7. The module met or exceeded my expectations.
8. The directions for completing the module were clear.
9. I experienced no technical problems with the module.
10. The module helped me better understand the problem of prostitution.
11. The module helped me better understand problem-oriented policing.
12. The prostitution problem in Central City was presented in a realistic manner.
13. The methods for analyzing the problem were logical and realistic.
14. I would like to see additional modules developed.

  By completing this form and submitting your information to ASU, you consent to:

  1. ASU using this information to contact you regarding information as you request.
  2. The terms of ASU's Privacy Statement.
  3. If you are in the European Union or another country or state that has adopted the GDPR (General Data Protection
    Regulation) or similar privacy protection, please also read ASU's European Supplement to ASU's Privacy Statement.
Subscribe to