POP Center Responses Gunshot Detection Page 6

Conclusion

AGDS triangulates the sound of gunfire from multiple sensors to provide an accurate location to police. AGDS are on track to become a common technology, especially in communities with elevated levels of gunfire. Though the benefits of such systems are not yet fully understood, most studies report faster police response times and an increase in evidence recovery (casings). The full effects of AGDS on gun violence are not yet clear, but adherence to best practices is likely to yield the best results. System costs vary depending on options, but typical costs are about $80,000 per square mile, per year.

Both the response to and investigation of AGDS alerts are critical aspects of best practices. A timely response and a thorough investigation of the mapped alert are essential. Relatedly, developing sound policies and operating procedures that prioritize the response and investigation is an important aspect of implementation. AGDS data can not only aid in investigative aspects of the response but also be used to develop preventative strategies for gunfire hotspots. In addition, these data can be used to gain a fuller understanding of the time and place of gunfire because the data are not affected by underreporting.

Even though deploying AGDS provides many potential upsides, not everyone will be in favor of such systems. For example, some are concerned that implementing AGDS may lead to over-policing in communities of color. Therefore, engaging community stakeholders and creating transparency are essential in the use of AGDS.