• Center for Problem oriented policing

POP Center Responses Video Surveillance of Public Places, 2nd Ed. Page 8

previous page next page

Appendix B: Site-specific Evaluations of Video Surveillance in Public Places

The following table summarizes a number of CCTV systems and the results of their evaluations. It is not an exhaustive list, as some studies may have been inadvertently omitted during the literature search for this guide. Also, a number of studies have been excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were when the evaluation report did not include sufficient information to corroborate any reported crime reduction, or where the evaluation was conducted by a party perceived to be heavily invested in the system.† This commonly occurred when a system was reported as a success in a newspaper article based solely on the comments of a city manager or local police department. When some evaluations reported findings that did not appear to accurately reflect the changing pattern of crime, they were either excluded, or the language was changed to a more general tone. As a result of this last caveat, if you require further information you should refer to the original study reports. This is the best way to judge the reliability of the findings and conclusions, as the quality of studies varies considerably.

† This is not to suggest or imply an inappropriate behavior on the evaluator’s part. Simply, the evaluator’s impartiality cannot be guaranteed and, therefore, the evaluation was excluded.

The table below emphasizes studies that have a strong quantitative component. This is not intended to negate the value of qualitative analysis, but to reflect the likely audience for the report. Most CCTV systems are implemented to tackle, at least as one aim, levels of reported crime. These are usually apparent in police recorded-crime records and so the table reflects more positively on reports that demonstrate they have examined and evaluated recorded-crime statistics in a robust manner. Studies are ordered by implementation date, with the most recent first.






Camera organization


Effect on crime

Effect on fear of crime



Research design

Gothenburg, Sweden

28 cameras in 3 neighborhoods 5 cameras are at each spot, 4 are fixed and 1 is movable

January 2018 and April 2018

CCTV was associated with a reduction in violence but no significant change in property crime or crime clearance. Effects vary by site.

 No information available

Cameras can be actively monitored but the extent to which this occurred is unknown

Gerell (2020)

Changes in crime and crime clearance in the 3 neighborhoods are compared to 6 control neighborhoods. Weighted displacement difference models are used to understand changes in crime and chi-square test are conducted for changes in crime-clearance rates.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

86 CCTV cameras grouped into 13 clusters

January 2003 and December 2012

Cameras had no effect on the level of violent street felonies. No significant impact was found for disorder crimes.

No information available

Cameras have a patrol function where they patrolled a specific area but can also be operated by the camera monitor. Cameras also recorded all footage 24 hours a day 7 days a week and footage was stored for 12 days.

Ratcliffe & Groff, 2019

A quasi-experimental repeated measure design which considered counts of crime events for both violent street felonies and disorder crimes in 13 spatial units of 120 temporal periods using a multilevel random effects model

Newark, New Jersey

64 CCTV cameras grouped into 38 schemes

July 2011 and September 2011

The experimental strategy was associated with significant reduction in violent crime and social disorder in treatment areas compared to control areas

 No information available

Cameras were monitored normally by 2 camera operators. During the experiment an additional operator was added to monitor treatment cameras.

Piza, Caplan, Kennedy & Gilchrist, 2015

A randomized block design control trial was used to assign each of the 38 CCTV schemes to either treatment or control group. Schemes were grouped into pairs based on their calls for service for violent crime, social disorder, and narcotics activity.

Surrey, British Columbia

12 cameras were installed at the car park: 11 fixed and one adjustable cameras

August 2009

Police data did not show much of an impact in of CCTV. Insurance data also do not show much of an impact.

 No information available

Camera recordings were stored for 7 days and were available upon request

Reid & Andresen, 2014

Structural break tests employed via linear regression were used to assess three trends in a variety of spatial units controlling for seasonal effects

Newark, New Jersey

73 dome cameras in plain view of pedestrians

March 2008 and July 2008

No significant difference between strategically and randomly place cameras. Significant decrease in auto thefts. No significant displacement and small diffusion benefits.

No information available

 No information available

Caplan, Kennedy, & Petrossian, 2011

Quasi-experimental design. Geographic information system mapping was used to create the 73 camera and control location boundaries. Crime data was compared for 13 months before and after camera installation.

Malaga, Spain

17 cameras in the two square miles of the main shopping center

March 2007

CCTV system did not significantly reduce crime. There is a possible displacement effect occurring and is more evident for crimes against property.

No significant difference in the fear of being a victim of crime

Cameras are pan, tilt, zoom high resolution models

Cerezo, 2013

Quasi-experimental design. Included experimental area, control area, and buffer areas. Considered both crime rates and victimization rates.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2 different camera types were used in the pilot program: 8 pan, tilt, zoom and 10 regular cameras. Cameras were located at 10 different sites.

January 2005 and August 2007

The introduction of CCTV cameras was associated with a 13% reduction in all crime in the target areas. However, not all sites showed a benefit from the camera placement.

No information available

The 8 pan, tilt, zoom cameras were actively monitored. 10 cameras did not allow for live monitoring although officers nearby with the correct equipment could theoretically view feed from cameras. The system recorded up to 5 days of activity.

Ratcliffe, Taniguchi, & Taylor, 2009

Two different evaluation techniques are used: hierarchical linear modeling and weighted displacement quotients

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

10 cameras monitored by police department installed in 4 areas and 8 cameras that record continuously installed in 8 locations

July 2006

13% reduction in crime through end of August 2017 overall. 4 camera sites had no reduction and 4 sites reduced crime and diffused benefits to surrounding streets.

No information available

10 cameras monitored by officers. 8 cameras officers can monitor from in patrol cars while nearby and cameras feed set continuously to hard drive.

Ratcliffe & Taniguchi, 2008

Hierarchical linear modeling was used to control for seasonal effects and preexisting temporal trends at each camera location. In order to also assess the effects of different cameras at different locations weighted displacement quotient analysis was utilized.

Los Angeles, California

5 cameras in Hollywood Boulevard & 6 cameras in Jordan Downs

February 2005 for Hollywood Boulevard, and October 2006 for Jordan Downs

Not statistically significant differences for violent crime, property crime, or displacement

No information available

All cameras were active monitoring systems

Cameron, Kolodinski, May & Williams, 2008

Quasi-experimental design to examine monthly crime data before and after the introduction of CCTV. Areas were categorized into target, buffer, or control areas. Relative effect size statistical tests were conducted.

Schenectady, New York

11 cameras with locations determined based on spatial concentration of crime

October 2003 – January 2007

 Total crime did decrease in the 150-foot area around the camera. Cameras were associated with declines in person rather than property crime. Cameras were very successful at reducing disorder. Cameras that were more visible were better at reducing crime. Mixed results were found for displacement and diffusion benefits.

No information available

Cameras operated on a patrol sequence with an average of 7 present viewing locations. Little viewing of live feed and footage was stored for 2 weeks.

McLean, Worden, & Kim, 2013

Interrupted time series analysis was conducted. Each of the 4 time periods where cameras were introduced were treated as interventions in the model.

Kabukicho, Tokyo, Japan

No information available

March 2002

Reduction in vehicle crime, slight reduction in violence, substantial reduction in larceny, within 50 meters of cameras

No information available

No information available

Harada et al., 2004

Geocoding crime events improved accuracy and better determined which crimes were within the CCTV area

Cincinnati, Ohio

Cameras sited in 3 city locations

Early 1999

Some reduction in calls for service and anti-social behavior in 2 sites (one with some diffusion), but an increase in anti-social behavior in a third location, as well as some displacement on implementation

No information available

No information available

Mazerolle et al., 2002

An ARIMA time series analysis of data derived from interpretation of video footage was combined with police incident data


Oslo, Norway

6 cameras

January 1999

Decrease in robbery/theft from person and bicycle theft


Civilians working at a police station

Winge & Knutsson, 2003

The data have some limitations, and the surveys are not large; however, the incident data were examined for experiment, control, and displacement areas

East Brighton, UK

10 cameras in a housing project

Summer 1998

Crime continued a long-term increase

Feelings of lack of safety continued after CCTV’s introduction

No information available

Squires, 2003

Some factors were out of the researchers’ control. There were potentially significant differences between pre- and post-survey groups, and the crime analysis does not break down the data into more meaningful offense categories.

Greater Easterhouse, Glasgow, Scotland

Not reported

May 1998

No overall crime reduction. Drug offenses and violent crime increased, but at a lower rate than in other areas. Other crime types not reported in the paper.

No information available

Civilian operators working at a police station

Hood, 2003

Adequate, but not all quantitative results reported

Camberwell, London, UK

17 cameras in a town center

January 1998

Street, vehicle, and violent crime decreased at a faster rate than before CCTV’s introduction, while the buffer and comparison areas saw an increase in crime

Of public surveyed, who knew about the cameras, 69% felt safer

Civilian, based at a public car park and linked to a police station

Sarno et al., 1999

4 years of crime data examined and supported with numerous qualitative approaches

East Street, London, UK

12 cameras covering a street market

January 1998

Vehicle crime and criminal damage decreased, though street crime increased (mainly in theft from the person; robberies decreased)

Of public surveyed who knew about the cameras, 53% felt safer

Civilian, based at a public car park and linked to a police station

Sarno et al., 1999

4 years of crime data examined and supported with numerous qualitative approaches

Five UK towns


March to July 1997

Assault-related emergency room visits decreased, recorded violence increased, suggesting that police intervention due to CCTV surveillance increased arrests and reduced the escalation of violence

No information available

No information available

Sivarajasingam, Shepherd, & Matthews, 2003

2 years of pre-and post-intervention data were explored for 5 experiment and 5 control towns and cities

Ilford, Essex, UK

Town center. Number of cameras not available.

May/June 1997

Reduction over 5 months for every crime type examined. Lesser reductions outside implementation area for a number of crime types. Crime in the CCTV area also declined compared to the same months in the previous year.

Modest improvement after CCTV implementation

No information available

Squires, 1998

A longer data period would have been able to correct the apparent seasonality

Elephant and Castle, London, UK

34 cameras around a shopping center

January 1997

Recorded crime fell 17% in both target and buffer areas. Steep decline in street robberies attributed to CCTV.

Of public surveyed who knew about the cameras, about 60% felt safer.

Civilian, based at a shopping center and linked to a police station

Sarno et al., 1999

4 years of crime data examined and supported with numerous qualitative approaches

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

29 cameras, in 3 areas, with variable viewing hours

Early 1997 to mid-2001

General reduction in crime levels. Some displacement to other areas, though still a net reduction. Some immediate diffusion of benefits.

Slight improvement in only one area

Variable hours, with two systems operational only during peak hours

Flight, Heerwaarden, & Soomeren, 2003

The systems were evaluated by means of an analysis of police records for one year before, and one year after CCTV implementation at each site, though the quantitative data were not fully explored

Gillingham, UK

7 town center cameras


Reduction in vehicle crime and robberies

No information available


Griffith, n.d.

The evaluation compared crime rates in the target area with a comparison site in a similar town with 5 years of aggregated data

Peckham, London, UK

14 cameras in a public retail area

October 1995

Inconclusive, due to limitations in access to recorded crime data

Of public surveyed who knew about the cameras, about 60% felt safer

Civilian, based at a public car park and linked to a police station

Sarno, Hough, & Bulos, 1999

Crime analysis was complicated by limited access to crime data due to the introduction date of a crime recording system. Researchers did manually gather data for a pre- and post-implementation period. Limitations in crime data outside the researchers’ control.

Burnley, UK

No information available


Substantial decline in most crime types. Some diffusion effect for most crime types.

No information available

No information available

Armitage, Smyth, & Pease, 1999

The study used a long-time series of data and also explored hourly temporal patterns

Glasgow, Scotland

32 city center cameras

November 1994

Marginal, though the system has helped with some major crime investigations



Ditton et al., 1999

3 years of crime data had seasonal variation removed before trend analysis, and pre- and post-surveys were conducted in control areas

Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

16 city center cameras

December 1992

Reduction in burglary (57%), theft from vehicle (50%), vehicle theft (47%), and criminal damage (34%). Reductions occurred in areas outside the CCTV area, but not to the same level.

No information available

Police and civilians in a police station

Brown, 1995

Crime data examined for 26 months before, and 15 months after, implementation

Airdrie, Scotland

12 town center cameras

November 1992

Overall, 21% reduction, especially crimes of dishonesty and vandalism. Some crime types increased, but this may be due to increased detections.

No information available

Civilian operators working at a police station

Short & Ditton, 1996

Researchers controlled for seasonality and used a long-time series before and after CCTV implementation

Birmingham, UK

9 city center cameras initially


Apparent crime control benefits (in robbery, burglary, and theft from person). Possible displacement of robbery and theft from person out of the area, as well as displacement of offending from vehicle theft to theft from vehicles. Some evidence of reduced personal victimization in CCTV area.

A positive change only in people who were aware the cameras had been installed

Civilian staff employed by the police

Brown, 1995

Nearly 4 years of data were used for the study, but the data were aggregated only to monthly beat counts

London, UK

4 different drug markets. Camera organization changed by site.


Effective in dispersing drug markets in 2 areas; in a third, users appear to have adapted to the cameras’ presence

No information available

No information available

Edmunds et al., 1996

Not able to assess from the information provided

King's Lynn, UK

60 cameras around the town


Vehicle crime continued ongoing reduction and reduced at a more significant rate compared to the surrounding police division. Burglary reduced in the evaluated CCTV area. Within 2 years, vehicle crime in the camera areas declined to nearly zero.

No information available


Brown, 1995

The evaluation was limited to cameras overlooking car parks only. The number of crime events is low, limiting the application of any statistical measures.

In 2005 a large UK Home Office study was published (Gill & Spriggs, 2005). This study evaluated 13 CCTV projects comprising 14 separate systems. The systems were implemented in a variety of ways, including at public car parks, in town centers, in residential areas and housing estates, and in hospital areas. Furthermore, the systems varied in type. Some were fixed, others redeployable. Some were digital, others analogue. Some were monitored full time, others for less than 24 hours a day. The variations in the system therefore had an impact on the success of the system. The table below aims to concisely summarize the ten systems relevant to this report.

Research design: Strong. Police recorded crime statistics were examined in both the target area and the comparison areas. Some projects were also evaluated for displacement effects. Where possible (as was the case in nearly all studies) at least one to two years of pre-and post-intervention crime data were gathered. Time-series techniques were used to control for seasonal fluctuations. In 12 of the areas, public attitude surveys explored the public’s perceptions of the CCTV systems and fear of crime. Researchers also identified other crime prevention measures taking place in the evaluation areas so the individual contribution of CCTV could be explored. Note that in the original report the names of the locations were changed to preserve anonymity. 



Camera organization

Effect on crime

Effect on fear of crime

City outskirts

47 cameras installed in a deprived area of residential, park, hospital, and light industrial land use

Significant reduction in crime

14% fewer respondents reported being worried about crime after CCTV installation. Other measures less clear.

South City

51 cameras added to an existing system in a mixed affluent/deprived city center area in southern England

10% reduction in crime, though there was a 12% reduction in the control area with no CCTV. Increased public order.

About 7% fewer respondents reported being worried about crime after CCTV installation

Shire Town

12 cameras installed in the town center of a Midlands former mining town

Crime reduced 4% in the town, while it increased 3% in the control site

12% fewer respondents at night and 4% during the day reported being worried about crime after CCTV installation. Greater reduction at night in control area.

Market Town

9 evaluated cameras. 2 new cameras, with further cameras added to an existing system, in the center of an affluent market town.

Crime increased 18% in the town, while only increasing 3% in the comparison site

No information available

Borough Town

40 new cameras installed in a small-town center aiming to reduce retail crime, alcohol problems, and criminal damage

No change in crime in the town center, while crime increased 14% in the comparison area

Fear of crime reduced

Northern Estate

11 new cameras introduced to a deprived public housing project in northern England

Crime decreased by 10% in the target area (especially burglary). Crime in the comparison area increased by 21%.

3% fewer respondents reported being worried about crime after CCTV installation. Similar reductions in control area.

Eastcap Estate

12 new cameras (10 evaluated) implemented into a deprived public housing project in southeast England

Crime increased in the target area, but only by 2% compared to a 5% increase in the control site. Some displacement within the target area.

3% increase in feelings of safety, matched with a similar level in control areas

Dual Estate

14 cameras (10 evaluated) installed to 3 areas of a deprived public housing project in southeast England

Crime increased 4% in the target area, and decreased 19% in the control area, suggesting a statistically significant difference

About 9-10% fewer respondents reported being worried about crime after CCTV installation. Significantly better findings than in control area.


8 new cameras used in a redeployable system which could be attached to any lamp post across a mixed/affluent residential area of southeast England

Crime increased by 73% in the target area, a statistically significant difference from the more modest 12% increase in the control area

No information available

Deploy Estate

11 new redeployable cameras implemented to different areas of a deprived public housing project

A 21% increase in crime recorded in the housing estate, compared to only a 3% increase in the control area

A slight improvement in those worried about crime in one area of the project compared to the comparison area. No change in the other area.

 previous page next page