Sign In / Sign Out
Navigation for Entire University
- ASU Home
- My ASU
- Colleges and Schools
- Map and Locations
Wilderness problems are a set of issues that take place in remote areas where land and open water has specific protection levels and use rights. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) defines seven protected area categories:
Governments, communities, private citizens, or a combination of the three, own and regulate activities on these areas. The environments provide a unique opportunity structure for problems to develop due to:
Wilderness problems often spill into rural, suburban, and urban areas, especially when products harvested in wild areas are processed, sold and consumed for local and international markets. Elephant poaching is an excellent example of a wilderness problem that spans a wide variety of actors and locations given the international demand for ivory. Conversely, urban demand for illegal narcotics, such as marijuana and methamphetamine, may cause manufacturers/growers to use protected areas for their operations to avoid detection. Knowing how wilderness problems connect to other settings is an important part of analyzing local problems and devising tailored solutions. Building coalitions of partners within, adjacent to, and beyond the borders of protected areas is a crucial part of addressing this set of issues.
|1 Agriculture and aquaculture|
Annual and perennial (non)timber crops
Livestock farming and ranching
|2 Energy production and mining|
Mining and quarrying
|3 Biological resource use|
Hunting and collecting terrestrial animals**
Gathering terrestrial plants
Logging and wood harvesting
Fishing and harvesting aquatic resources
|4 Human intrusions and disturbance|
War, civil unrest and military exercises
Work and other activities
|5 Human-wildlife conflict|
|6 Natural system modifications|
Fire and fire suppression
Other ecosystem modifications
|7 Invasive and other problematic species and genes|
* Threat categorizations partly drawn from Salafsky, N., Salzer, D., Stattersfield, A.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Neugarten, R., Butchart, S.H.M., Collen, B., Cox, N., Master, L.L., O'Connor, S. & Wilkie, D. (2007). "A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: unified classifications of threats and actions." Conservation Biology, 22(4), 897-911. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00937.x
** Each type of poaching can be committed using a variety of techniques for killing, detection and transportation Active poaching (finding and killing animal): professional gun, homemade gun, bow and arrow (poisoned arrows), dogs with spear, dogs with net, tranquilizer dart, spotlighting, vehicle (intentional roadkill), aerial (shooting from plane/helicopter), drones (used to scout), hunting platforms (illegally constructed) Passive poaching (laying traps for animal): snaring (different types of material for different animals), gin traps, pit traps, hanging spear trap, poison (i.e. water or food source), mist nets (for birds)
*** Encroachment is the act of (gradually) infringing on protected area land to claim this for oneself for various reasons (perceived right, agricultural expansion, etc.)
Problem-oriented policing (POP) is a proven method for solving problems in urban, suburban, and rural settings. Led by the SARA (Scan/Analyze/Respond/Assess) process, POP has helped numerous police agencies around the globe rethink how they deal with persistent problems. Recognizing that agencies have limited resources and mandates, POP encourages them to work more closely with other government agencies, non-governmental organizations, business owners, and private citizens to address problems more effectively.
Applying this approach to wilderness problems enables law enforcement agencies, and other interested organizations such as conservation NGOs, to restructure how they identify and solve problems that threaten the sustainability of ecosystems. Rather than relying solely on deterrence through enforcement, such as arresting offenders, POP looks for ways to reduce opportunities for anti-social behavior by focusing on specific problems, and tailoring prevention solutions to the local context. POP’s focus on prevention is especially important for wilderness problems because enforcement agencies are often disappointed by the courts which see crimes such as poaching, illegal logging, or overfishing as minor offenses. This reality means that when offenders are caught—which they rarely are—their punishments are minimal even when a strong case is presented.
The purpose of the Wilderness Problems portal of the Center for Problem-Oriented Policing is to develop and share resources to help practitioners implement a problem-solving approach.
This volume is a collection of wildlife crime scripts from around the world written by practitioners. The objectives of the project are to (a) introduce the crime script methodology to wildlife protection organizations and (b) create a collection of scripts to compare and contrast the modus operandi of offenders committing the same crimes in different contexts.
Call for Submissions
The Poaching Diaries is a joint project between the NSCR’s Wildlife Crime Cluster and the Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. The goal of the project is to facilitate the sharing of information and experiences between practitioners working in wildlife protection. To do this, the project will collect a series of crime scripts from wilderness areas around the world and publish them as an open-access volume. The objectives are two-fold: (1) help practitioners familiarize themselves with the crime script methodology and (2) create a resource that enables comparison of similar behaviors across diverse contexts.
What is a crime script?
Crime scripts are a step-by-step description of an offender’s actions during the preparation, execution, and aftermath of a crime. The purpose of these scripts is to help practitioners broaden their thinking about crime beyond the event itself. By mapping out an offender’s actions, it is possible to identify a larger number of intervention points to prevent crime by disrupting each of the three phases.
Preparation: Obtain necessary tools and information
Execution: Select target and commit offense
Aftermath: Get away and enjoy benefits
What does a wildlife crime script look like?
Crime scripts come in different shapes and sizes including illustrations, lists, and tables. The table below gives an example of a hypothetical crime script for bushmeat with possible responses.
Get trap (i.e. snare or gin trap) and
form hunting party (if necessary)
|Control sale of traps|
|Entering setting||Enter protected area||Monitor known entry points|
|Enabling conditions||Move without being seen or heard|
Place patrols and observation posts in
areas known for poaching activity
Locate animal path that is
|Patrol same paths as animals|
|Completing the crime|
Lay trap, exit protected area, recheck trap, kill animal,
cut into pieces, possibly smoke meat
Regularly check areas known for trapping,
lay ambushes on fresh traps, remove old traps
|Exiting the setting||Walk out of protected area||Monitor known exit points|
|Aftermath||Sell meat in nearby community||Monitor bush meat markets|
How do you collect information for a crime script?
Crime scripts can be written using a variety of information sources including: practitioner experience, expert knowledge, courtroom proceedings, focus groups, interviews with protection personnel, incident reports, postarrest interviews, and offender-based research. While any single data source is an acceptable way to write a crime script, combining information from multiple sources is preferable.
What type of problems will be included in The Poaching Diaries?
The volume is looking to include as many types of wildlife protection problems as possible including, but not limited to, poaching of any species, crimes involving flora (i.e. illegal timber harvesting and charcoaling), trafficking of wildlife products, and retaliatory killings. All acts against the rule of law as well as noncompliance with conservation rules can be included. The aim is to provide tools to reduce such activities, not to criminalize legal activity.
How specific should a crime script be?
When writing a crime script, it is best to be very crime-, time-, and place-specific. For example, elephant poaching at the country level is far too broad. Instead, you would want to focus on elephant poaching, in a specific area, using a specific method (i.e. elephant poaching with poisoned arrows the southern region of the Tsavo landscape). The project lead will help contributors narrow their focus if necessary.
What is the format for submissions?
Each script will include a description of the problem, information source(s) used, the crime script, and a brief discussion of potential prevention measures in approximately 1,000 words. The Project Lead provides a template and further introduction to crime scripting to those who participate, to ensure the scripts are comparable across contexts and the volume is easy to read. For those who are interested, webinars will be held to help contributors learn more about the crime script methodology and answer questions they may have regarding data collection.
Who should participate?
Submissions are welcome from all wildlife conservation and protection practitioners be they government agencies, non-governmental organizations, communities, and academics. Where possible, contributors can submit two or three crime scripts from a single geographic area to show the overlap of actions, or lack thereof. For example, one area might submit scripts for (1) snaring of small antelope for bush meat, (2) snaring of large mammals for bush meat, and (3) illegal firewood collection. Given that crime scripting will be new to most contributors, the Project Lead will spend significant time providing assistance, guidance, and feedback to interested parties.
Idea submissions should be a simple description, 50-100 words, of the script you would like to write and the name of each contributor. Please note all ideas will be accepted unless they do not fit the scope of the volume. The Project Lead will work closely with contributors to help them turn their idea into a crime script.
15 July 2019: Idea submissions due (late submissions will also be considered)
1 October 2019: First draft of crime script due (webinars and support from July to Sept)
1 December 2019: Draft returned with Project Lead comments and suggestions
1 March 2020: Deadline for final draft
1 June 2020: Collection published on Center for Problem-Oriented Policing website
To contribute a script please send all idea submissions and questions to the Project Lead, Andrew Lemieux at email@example.com.
This guide will introduce analysts how to think about local crime problems, synthesize information, and produce useful output to direct operations.
Problem Specific Guide: Wildlife Poaching on Federal Lands in the United States
In the tradition of problem-specific guides already available from the Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, this guide will help law enforcement agencies structure their thinking and analysis about poaching on federal lands in the United States. The guide synthesizes the academic literature available on this topic and provides a framework for problem solving at the local level.
Interactive Poaching Problem Analysis Module
This ‘game’ exposes wildlife protection organizations to the problem-solving approach using a hypothetical example of poaching in a protected area. Players receive an overview of the problem and then choose data sources to explore it in greater depth. After analyzing the problem, they design tailored solutions that go beyond traditional enforcement.
The editor-in-chief, Andrew M. Lemieux, oversees content development for the Wilderness Problems section with support from an editorial board comprising academics and practitioners. If you are interested in developing content, have suggestions for content development, or know of resources already available, please contact the editor-in-chief.
Meredith Gore (Michigan State University)
Johnathan Hunter (Wildlife Conservation Society)
Jennifer Mailley (UK Home Office)
William Moreto (University of Central Florida)
Gohar Petrossian (John Jay School of Criminal Justice)
Robert Pickles (Panthera)
Steven Pires (Florida International University)
Andrew M. Lemieux
Andrew M. Lemieux is a researcher at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR). He coordinates the NSCR’s Wildlife Crime Cluster and is a member of the Spatial and Temporal Crime Patterns Cluster. Over the last decade, Andrew has worked with numerous wildlife-protection agencies in Africa and Asia including governmental, non-governmental, and private entities. His work revolves around the collection and use of data for decision-making, with an emphasis on problem solving and situational crime prevention. He has spent considerable time in the field with rangers on the front line of protection efforts and with managers looking for innovative ways to protect their ecosystem. These experiences are what led Andrew to promote the use of problem solving for wildlife protection as a way to find holistic solutions that are mutually beneficial to wildlife and communities.
Meredith Gore is a conservation social scientist leveraging concepts of risk to enhance understanding of human-environment relationships. Her scholarship is designed to build evidence for action. The majority of her scientific inquiry can be described as convergence research on conservation issues such as wildlife trafficking, illegal logging, fishing and mining.
For approximately 10 years, she was jointly appointed in the Department of Fisheries & Wildlife in the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources and School of Criminal Justice in the College of Social Science at Michigan State University; now the former is her home.
Meredith received her PhD in Natural Resource Policy and Management from Cornell University, MA in Environment and Resource Policy from George Washington University, and BA in Anthropology and Environmental Studies from Brandeis University.
Jonathan Hunter served seven years in the UK’s Metropolitan Police Service before moving to Southeast Asia where he has been adapting his experience of front-line site-based enforcement to the fight against illegal wildlife trade. During this time, Jonathan has developed bespoke information management systems for sites, and led problem-solving processes to develop strategies for site based law enforcement as well as capacity building in intelligence gathering and handling, safety protocols and enforcement management.
Jen Mailley has over twenty years of experience in crime research and control. She currently works as a senior analyst in the Crime and Policing Analysis Unit of the UK Home Office. Her experience in wildlife crime includes the use of problem-solving to address tiger poaching in Malaysia, hands-on capacity building for using forensic science in addressing wildlife crime, and developing a novel method for assessing the social and economic costs of wildlife crime by including natural capital costs.
She currently sits on the Scientific Advisory Group for Wildlife Crime of the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, and the UK NWCU’s Poaching Priority Delivery Group (more info at: PPDG).
William D. Moreto is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Central Florida. He received his Ph.D. from the Rutgers School of Criminal Justice in 2013. He is a research fellow of the Wildlife Crime cluster at the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, and Research Associate of the Rutgers Center for Conservation Criminology and Ecology. His research centers on the study of wildlife crime, wildlife law enforcement, environmental criminology and crime science, situational crime prevention, policing, and conservation social science. He has conducted fieldwork in Kenya, Nepal, the Philippines, Uganda, and the United States, and has led data collection in over 18 countries. His research can be found in leading journals, including Justice Quarterly, British Journal of Criminology, Qualitative Research, and Oryx: The International Journal of Conservation. He is the lead author of Wildlife Crime: An Environmental Criminology and Crime Science Perspective (Carolina Academic Press) and editor of Wildlife Crime: From Theory to Practice (Temple University Press).
Gohar Petrossian is an assistant professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at CUNY – John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Her research interests include crimes against wildlife, with a particular interest in IUU fishing, spatial and temporal analysis of crime and GIS mapping, environmental criminology and opportunity theories, and crime prevention. She is currently working on a book titled Last Fish Swimming: The Global Crime of Illegal Fishing (Global Crime and Justice Series. ABC-CLIO, LLC, Praeger Imprint).
Stephen Pires, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Florida International University in Miami, Florida. He is an expert on the illegal wildlife trade with a particular focus on commonly-poached species (i.e. hot products), illicit markets, & the organization of the illegal trade. His work has appeared in the Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, The British Journal of Criminology, Bird Conservational International, and Forest Policy & Economics. In addition, he has co-authored the book, “Wildlife Crime: An Environmental Criminology and Crime Science Perspective” and co-edited the book, "Quantitative Studies in Green and Conservation Criminology."
Julie Viollaz works as the Wildlife Crime Research Officer for the Crime Research Section of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Prior to this, she was a research Associate at Michigan State University and worked as a consultant on wildlife crime issues. She has a Ph.D. in Criminal Justice from the CUNY Graduate Center & John Jay College of Criminal Justice and a B.A. in Biology from Mount Holyoke College. She specializes in field interventions to help communities, law enforcement personnel, and NGOs apply crime prevention techniques to poaching and wildlife trafficking. She was part of the team that conducted the 2016 mid-term evaluation of USAID’s Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (Phase III) in the Congo Basin and has worked with a range of government agencies and NGOs including the WWF, FFI, Global Wildlife Conservation, UN, INTERPOL, USAID, U.S. State Department, and NYPD.